Communities are on my mind this week: we interact with them in so many ways, find them in so many places and achieve so much within and alongside them (which is why they sit at the heart of Social Leadership). Today, i’m reflecting on the role of subversive communities to drive change.
Communities serve many functions: for challenge, for support, to co-create meaning and for ‘sense making‘, but a central role is to subvert established authority and process. Effectively, they can be bodies for driving change.
I’m particularly interested in this co-creative and co-owned model as it changes the fundamental dynamic of change: instead of it being us against the organisation, it becomes a question of whether you are part of the change community or outside it, which is a totally different decision. Ally this with the supportive and nurturing nature of community, and it’s a powerful model to both drive and support organisational change.
Look at NHS Change Day, a move to drive (to co-create) change within the NHS (in the UK and other countries through allied approaches and methods. What i really like about this is it’s truly social nature of change and it’s willingness for the community to shape the story. NHS Change Day (and allied transformation efforts) isn’t about a defined purpose, or at least not a purpose beyond making things better. Instead, it’s about creating a permissive environment to be excellent: it’s about creating a situation where it’s ok to talk about change and to gather momentum behind it.
The use of ‘pledges‘ is powerful: a site where you can make a pledge and share those of others: this isn’t an organisational restructure towards a defined goal, it’s about making your inner desire public, within the safety of a community of change. Like all good communities, there are shared values: around patient care, a desire to be better, a desire to support others in being better. This shared vision leads to momentum. Momentum challenges inertia (and i’ll be forgiven for stating that the NHS, like many organisations, is not short of inertia).
We can reframe the dynamics of change, away from restructuring and budgets towards desire and community. We normalise the conversation about change, making it easy to amplify our messages in a supportive shared space.
It’s a long journey, but a fascinating one.
Communities can subvert process and do so in an inclusive and dynamic way. That’s the reality of change in the Social Age, and you may as well be part of it, because it happens anyway, whether sanctioned or not.
Terrific post, “subversive” really is the apt term. Subversion doesn’t mean looking to dismantle or undercut something as a means unto itself – it is the natural byproduct of humans questing the status quo as they adapt to shifting contexts. Nothing is “fixed” – we know that in the face of any change “movement” or conversation there will be vocal resistance. Toxic environments deny permission to question – countering this tendency from a cultural (not positional) level is critical.
Absolutely agree: creating permissive spaces for challenge. Creating communities of change!
Thanks for sharing those ideas 🙂
Pingback: Subversive social communities to drive organisa...
I love the point you make about reframing the dynamics of change from focusing on the restructuring and budget to desire and community. I think this moves us away from thinking about all the barriers to thinking about what might be. It opens up the imagination instead of constraining it.
Thanks David, I think it moves us beyond process (which tends to constrain) towards mindset (which can liberate).
Reblogged this on GemStGem and commented:
This is an interesting article about how subversive social communities are making changes in organisations that was shared on Yammer at work. It’s good to see these thoughts articulated like this, but I think that subversive change by small, passionate groups of people always been the way that cultural shifts have been made, whether these communities are formalised or not and whether or not they’re in an organisation or in society in general.
I definitely agree with the idea idea that our role in a community is dependent on reputation, not hierarchy.
Pingback: Subversive social communities to drive organisational change | Julian Stodd’s Learning Blog | NHS Improving Quality
Pingback: The illusion of permanence in an age of change | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Evolutions in Leadership | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: The Pain of Change | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Headlines | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Demolishing the office | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: A smoking culture | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Breaking Convention | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: A marketplace for creativity: why collaboration may be infectious | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Stories and Sea Shanties | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Creative Space | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Assailing the Castle of Resistance | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: The Road to Agility | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Unlocking Innovation in Teams | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: What you need to know about ‘The Social Age’ | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Haight Ashbury’s Hippies: Permission to think differently | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Reflections on #mLearnCon: learning from our social lives | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Writing: Milestones | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Social Leadership: crossing boundaries | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Subversive social communities to drive organisa...
Pingback: Subversive social communities to drive organisational change | millionairesoul
Pingback: #RRHH #HR Subversive social communities to driv...
Pingback: Radical Change: engaging communities | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: How to Build and Moderate a thriving Social Learning Community: Part 1 – Forming | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Reflection: why fairness? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Tradition and Change | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: A Guide to Developing Social Leadership | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Invested in the Status Quo? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Change or Churn? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Anchored in the Past, or Invested in the Future? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Reflecting on Engagement in the Social Age | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Provocative Writing for a Better World: #WorkingOutLoud on an Experiment for the Social Age | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: 4 Flavours of Culture: Potential, Fractured, Functional, Invested | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: The Invisible Organisation: Why Social Leadership? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Ecosystem change & Organisational Design [part 1] | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog
Pingback: Building the Socially Dynamic Organisation | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog