Agreeing to Disagree

To engage with those people we agree with is easy: to engage across dissent, hard. Within our tribes, our established social structures, we understand both power, and consequence, and can chart a safe path accordingly, but when we venture beyond our ‘known’ spaces, the risk is much higher.

Sharing Uncertainty

Talking today about the Socially Dynamic Organisation, one thing is clear to me: we will be unlikely to effect the change we wish to see if we operate purely within our know spaces: to truly change, we will have to engage in the hard ones.

Engaging around our differences means bringing a certain humility, a certain, strength, a willingness to share uncertainty. But if we can do so, if we can construct and share our stories of difference, then who knows, maybe we will truly change.

About julianstodd

Author, Artist, Researcher, and Founder of Sea Salt Learning. My work explores the context of the Social Age and the intersection of formal and social systems.
This entry was posted in Social Leadership and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Agreeing to Disagree

  1. I agree – it is in those challenging spaces where creativity and innovation can really flourish. But what you are suggesting is REALLY difficult. It sits at the heart of why people by the inclusion aspect of D&I so challenging – managing differences (in gender, culture, race, experience, cognitive difference) can be very hard and you need a lot of interpersonal and conversational skills to be good at it. Its something that we are looking at currently!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.