Gender Effects in Trust: a #WorkingOutLoud post

Do men and women think about, or experience, ‘trust’ differently? At this early stage in the Landscape of Trust research, it’s hard to say for sure, but what is clear is that, across a range of metrics, gender is one of the most mobile variables. Yesterday i wrote about the clear difference in the emotional tone words that the different genders use, and this effect was also visible in the earlier analysis of the use of the words ‘trust’ and ‘mistrust’: in the first analysis, more women than men used the word ‘mistrust’, whilst in the larger group analysis, the effect reversed by 180 degrees, so currently more men use ‘mistrust’ in their descriptions.

Does Gender Impact Trust

None of this can have too much read into it: one possibility of the movement is the nature of the data gathering. Often i work with a new group, i recruit a new cohort, and they take part in the research, and it’s a fact of the groups i work with that they can often be strongly gender biased. For example. When i work with military groups, they often are predominantly male, nurses are often predominantly female, HR groups tend to be more female, so this may cause the data to lurch. Or there may be deeper effects.

I could share a hypothesis that cultural normalisation causes us to take gender stereotyped roles, and that this is showing up in the data. Forgive my choosing a clumsy example, but one ‘stereotype’ might be that in a relationship breakup, the women will cry and sit with her friends, whilst a may will go out drinking and be boisterous with his mates (i’m deliberately choosing a clumsy stereotype). Perhaps this feeds into culturally normalised use of language?

There are some other effects around gender that are interesting, around some of the calibration questions. Here are the results from two of them:

Those devoted to unselfish causes are often exploited by others”, where [1] is ‘Strongly Disagree’, and [5] is ‘Strongly Agree’.

In the age group of 24-35, women average 2.42 and men, 3.86, so a significant shift, and one that is getting stronger as the sample size grows (this result is from analysis of the first 178 responses).

There will be more people who will not work if the social security system is developed further”, where [1] is ‘Strongly Disagree’, and [5] is ‘Strongly Agree’.

In the same age bracket, of 24-35, women average at 2.31, and men at 3.42, again, a significant difference.

Out of all the factors being measured, admittedly with what is still a small sample size, gender is the most common variable affecting responses.

I stressed yesterday the nature of this Landscape of Trust research, and i will repeat today: i’m using community to carry out an ambitious global study to produce an open data set. We are sharing one level of analysis, but i hope in time that other people will reinterpret it and share others, and that between us we will form and test ideas. My reflection is this: cultural roles are deeply embedded from a very early age, gender stereotypes are dominant and persistent, so i expect that some of this will be embedded into our patterns of language. If that were true, it would not be surprising that we see differences.

Beyond that, i am less sure: some stereotypes may lead us to think that women are more emotional, perhaps more likely to be reflective. Men may be more likely to be brusque or macho about the subject. But bear in mind the other data i shared yesterday: the significant majority of participants, across both genders, strongly used ‘analytic’ language around trust, with a minority using ‘confident’ language. So no strong gender effect there.

This is early stage #WorkingOutLoud, perhaps as the sample grows, these effects will iron out: certainly we will consciously try to effect balance, for example, i can recruit a group of male nurses to take part.

Again, my own view is this: i don’t think that men and women experience trust differently, but i could see that there may be trends towards willingness to reflect upon it, and i could see differences in normalised language showing up, but with all of this, time will tell.

Please feel free to share your own experiences and views, and do take part in the research if you have not yet done so. I will be sharing the first Research Report at the end of September, you can sign up here.

Advertisements

About julianstodd

A learning and development professional specialising in e-learning and learning technology.
This entry was posted in Gender, Trust and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Gender Effects in Trust: a #WorkingOutLoud post

  1. Pingback: Developing a Prototype Trust Diagnostic | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  2. Gail Radecki says:

    I once had a difficult time working with someone I didn’t trust, whereas a man who didn’t trust the same individual was still able to work comfortably enough in that environment. When asked about it, his perception of the need for trust in that context was low, where mine was very high. My ability to work effectively and to feel comfortable in that setting was pivotal to my work experience and he really didn’t understand that. To him, it was just a job and it didn’t really affect him other than to make him more watchful of the untrusted person’s behaviors. I, on the other hand, felt ill every day at work because it upset me so much.

  3. Pingback: #WorkingOutLoud on The Projection and Flow of Trust | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  4. Pingback: Aggregated Cultural Failure | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  5. Pingback: The Trust Diagnostic: #WorkingOutLoud on the Alpha Group Analysis | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s