Exploring the Triangle of Trust

Last week I introduced the Triangle of Trust as a way of looking at how we can apply the Landscape of Trust work: it’s intended to be used as a developmental framework where we explore the relationship between values, intention, actions, and impact. Today, I want to just take a look at the types of relationships that exist between the separate elements.

Landscape of Trust - Triangle of Trust

We start with intention: any given situation what is it my intention to achieve. My intention may map closely against my own individual Landscape of Trust, certainly it is closely informed by it. There is a gap between intention and action: intention is internal, moderated by our values and views of trust, whilst action is subject to external pressure and cultural pressure. Our intention can be swamped by these dominant factors before it reaches actions.

For example, I may intend to do something one way, the pressure from the organisation, either in terms of processes, rules, or tacit understanding, may direct me to take different action, action which is unaligned with my core values and intent. I may be entirely aware that this is the case, for this is the cost of being within a culture. There is therefore no direct correlation between intention and action.

Landscape of Trust - Triangle of Trust

Actions are broadcast into the world, and they have an impact. The broadcast nature of action directly impacts the individual, so action is causal of impact, but not deterministic. Impact is internally moderated: how I feel about something is the impact that it has, or at least part of it. Whatever action you take, you can never fully control the impact it has, hence, it is not deterministic.

The relationship between impact and intention is decidedly loose, indeed we could argue there is often no link whatsoever. Values feed intention, intention informs action, but does not determine it, action causes impact, but equally is not deterministic of it, so quite clearly intention is not deterministic of impact. There is no causality necessarily, because intention may have been entirely derailed by external cultural pressure before we even get to action.

In some instances, intention may directly cause impact, whilst in others, there is no causation at all. Essentially, what we see, is that this is unpredictable. Within the Triangle of Trust work, this is really the point: being well-intentioned may have little or no correlation on impact. We sometimes work on the notion that our values are connected to the values of other people, whilst in fact it is our impact which is directly felt by other people, and it is the impact of other people that we feel most directly ourselves.

A mistake is to believe that impact relates to intent.

About julianstodd

Author, Artist, Researcher, and Founder of Sea Salt Learning. My work explores the context of the Social Age and the intersection of formal and social systems.
This entry was posted in Trust and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Exploring the Triangle of Trust

  1. Pingback: Illusion of Trust: The Terms and Conditions of Equality | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  2. Pingback: The Social Age Safari 2017 – A Co-Created Conference | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  3. Pingback: The Future Of HR | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  4. Pingback: Friction: Dynamic Tension | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  5. Pingback: The Erosion and Rebuilding of Culture | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  6. Pingback: The Landscape of Trust Research Project 2017 | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  7. Pingback: The Landscape of Trust Research: 4% | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  8. Pingback: #WorkingOutLoud: bringing ‘The Trust Sketchbook’ to life | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  9. Pingback: Organisational Pollution and Ethical Choice | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  10. Pingback: #WorkingOutLoud on The Projection and Flow of Trust | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  11. Pingback: Aggregated Cultural Failure | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  12. Pingback: Leading with Trust: A Development Pathway | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  13. Pingback: Guide to the Social Age 2019: Authenticity | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.