Monarchs and Monasteries: Emergent Communities in the Social Age

There’s the thing, then, much later, the memory of the thing.

Dissolution of the Monasteries

The moment when you push aside the brambles, kick down the tall grass and see the old stones and crumbling mortar revealed to the light of day one more time.

Walk anywhere you like in the UK and you walk through history: remnants of which loiter in the landscape like broken teeth and discarded shoes. Repurposed, reused, reinterpreted, made relevant for the modern age.

In Medieval times, the monasteries were a network of power and social cohesion, spread through the landscape, permeating every city and infiltrating the countryside. They weren’t additions, bolted onto communities, but rather central in their development and, through taxation, tithes and influence, central to their growth.

The Church represents itself through architecture, ritual and costume. Religious buildings are of a particular style. Religious buildings serve many purposes: they are iconic in that they symbolise power, a physical representation of the power of the church cut into the landscape. They are representative of community, indeed, they housed communities. A monastery without a community is just a shell, a space, waiting to be. Buildings alone do not make purpose: rather they facilitate communities, who create stories and share them.

The buildings themselves can shape the story, may even house the story in libraries and great halls, but without the community, they lose context, lose their meaning. Monasteries were hubs: concentrations of resource, of power, of influence.

I worked for a while as an archaeologist, unearthing traces of buildings long gone: wooden posts in the ground leave traces as darker soil, whilst stone walls leave behind foundations. One trench i worked on yielded the ash from a fireplace and rusty deposits that indicated a smithy, where the blacksmith of the village had fashioned horseshoes and gone about his work. But that was just a supposition: we examined the evidence and made a guess. It was close to the church, which survived, but located today in a field of cows. The rest of the village was long gone, abandoned centuries ago.

The monastic network spread far and wide, imposing stone buildings, cloisters and seminaries. But nothing lasts forever and their time came around 1540 when King Henry VIII disbanded them through a set of legal measures, appropriating their wealth for the crown and, in the process, ridding himself of a headache.

The people were dispersed, the treasures seized. The costumes were discarded or reused and the rituals hidden undercover, restricted, persecuted or lost. But the buildings remained, becoming, in time, not places for worship but, often, sources of building material. Quarries, not of stone in the ground but rather of stone ready cut and carved, ready for repurposing.

So the physical shape of the monasteries changed: they spread, piece by piece into the landscape. Reused, repurposed: you will find farmhouses and private homes that incorporate a strangely decorated door post or a particularly grand window, borrowed and adapted to fit a new space.

The monasteries were rooted in architecture, grounded in reality: but the idea of the church, belief itself, was not. Belief needs no home except that which we create in ourselves and our stories.

The monasteries fell, but the Church survived. The rituals and beliefs were grounded not in massive stone foundations and high vaulted ceilings but rather in shared purpose, shared values, shared intent, which is less tangible, harder to stamp out and prone to amplification.

In the Social Age, the cathedrals are virtual and the communities online. United by purpose, intent, belief and value.

And they are emergent.

The monasteries took centuries to build, decades to decay, but our latter day communities are born in an instant and movable at will. The infrastructure that we use to build our churches of knowledge is democratised and free: whilst infrastructure used to differentiate us, used to take massive effort, time and money to assemble, today it’s effortless.

Today our communities are often grounded in shared values and purpose: we engage in communities or create them as we need. It’s a core skill of the Social Age to IDENTIFY where these communities sit, to ENGAGE effectively and to add VALUE once we are in.

But furthermore, we can CREATE them: if the community doesn’t exist, it’s our role to build it. We don’t need eight hundred tons of lime mortar and a stonemason anymore: just an idea to build momentum around.

The monasteries made the Medieval Church lethargic: grounded as they were in massive architecture, they were institutionally unable to adapt to the changing political and sociological landscape. Organisations can learn from this: learn to be agile, and agility includes the ability to host emergent communities.

In the Social Age, communities host learning, drive change and share best practice. We can use them to be more agile, as long as we are fluid in our approach. Don’t build your own monastery: build momentum in your stories instead.

About julianstodd

Author, Artist, Researcher, and Founder of Sea Salt Learning. My work explores the context of the Social Age and the intersection of formal and social systems.
This entry was posted in Adaptability and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to Monarchs and Monasteries: Emergent Communities in the Social Age

  1. dnlblank says:

    I really like this post. There are lots of hooks to what I am reading and working on. Community building is key today, has been in the past, and will be in the future. I agree that communities host learning. My hypothesis is that where learning isn’t happening (i.e. failing schools in urban settings) the cause is largely a breakdown in the community due to a lack of compelling stories that have the momentum to motivate. So there is much talk about content and standards, but none of that addresses the lack of story with momentum. Content and standards need to be there, but it is momentum that will break through the cynicism and apathy that seem to plague failing education systems.

    • julianstodd says:

      There’s a lot to talk about here, a lot of truth in that. Maybe something about how we find pride and momentum in education: at a time when we are quick to gloat on failing educational establishments, do we allow for the pride of success? For the builidng of tribal purpose and expression? If you look at how governments typically tackle failing schools, it’s by new buildings and new leadership, but so much must reside in the history, cohesion and purpose of the community, none of which is held in bricks and mortar, or by the figurehead. It’s a co-created pride.

      As always, thanks for sharing your thoughts and being part of the community here, best wishes, Julian

      • dnlblank says:

        Often times I think we are trying to take the products of an irreversible chemical reaction and put them on the reactants side of the equation in hope that we get real reactants. We have great school buildings and leadership because we have great communities. Great communities produce these things, but it doesn’t work the other way around. Building a great school building doesn’t produce a great community. We have it backwards or upside down.

  2. kjeannette says:

    Hello Julian, This is a a great analogy – one I’ve thought about before, but have not developed. I’ve bookmarked this so I can share this analogy about how communities have changed and how we can build community with others now and in the future. It’s definitely an art and a science to: “IDENTIFY where these communities sit, to ENGAGE effectively and to add VALUE once we are in.”. I recently put some thoughts together on how community managers have a role in agile leadership and creating social comfort in building learning communities. I thought they may be relevant to this post.

    • julianstodd says:

      Sounds interesting, please do share a link to it? Community managers are key, and increasingly organisations need to move beyond viewing them as simply moderators of content: they are facilitators and can drive engagement.

      • kjeannette says:

        I thought I had pasted the link at the end

        Thanks for mentioning that I had not! (And my apologies for leaving the s off your name – I’ll try to do better next time 🙂

        The good news is that now I have a chance to say that posts you’ve been writing (after this one) are helping me come up with ways to talk about these ’emerging community’ concepts. That is part of the reason I started to commit to blogging. It’s been very hard to explain the ideas and issues of emerging communities that are unrealized, unknown, or less understood by many others that are not as presently engaged or invested in such online communities (yet).

  3. Pingback: This Week’s Links « Timothy Siburg

  4. Pingback: Reflections from Learning Technology conference 2015: Day 2 | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  5. Pingback: Induction: the mechanisms of joining up. A #WorkingOutLoud post | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  6. Pingback: Edgelands | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  7. Pingback: Friends Forever? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  8. Pingback: Relating to People | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  9. Pingback: Traverse | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  10. Pingback: Layers of Culture: can you see the Graffiti? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  11. Pingback: Tokens and Totems | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  12. Pingback: The Difference of Digital: are all Conversations Equal? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  13. Pingback: The Shadow of Ritual | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  14. Pingback: CIPD Show 2015 Day 2: Power and Control | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  15. Pingback: Engagement and Silence | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  16. Pingback: “Engagement”, una de las bases de la Educación Disruptiva”! | juandon. Innovación y conocimiento

  17. Pingback: Brooklyn: Rough Trade and Culture | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  18. Pingback: Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas: Transient Culture | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  19. Pingback: The Change Leader: Framing Change | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  20. Pingback: The Hidden Story | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  21. Pingback: Every Time: Reflecting on Learning | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  22. Pingback: The Social Age Safari: Communities and Stories | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  23. Pingback: Communities: A Story In Social Leadership | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  24. Pingback: Disrupción: cuando la innovación acaba con su función. – juandon. Innovación y conocimiento

  25. Pingback: EDUCACIÓN DISRUPTIVA: Tratado y compedio – juandon. Innovación y conocimiento

  26. Pingback: Liderajes e investigaciones transdisciplinares en escenarios de aprendizaje tecnificados y en red – juandon. Innovación y conocimiento

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.