Fractured Culture: Exclusion

I’m prompted to write about exclusion today by a friend who described the bullying she’s been subjected to at work. After a protracted period of negativity, she’s talked about leaving, about taking herself away from such a toxic culture, and i can’t blame her, but we discussed responsibility and the need to drive change. Cultures rarely reform themselves.

Fractured Culture

When we lack shared values, the culture can fracture and people are excluded

Strong cultures are cohesive, forged around shared values, around common purpose: that doesn’t mean that they are healthy, just that they relate around shared intent. They can exclude those who differ from that view, people who are different. That’s all well and good in some cases: for example, football teams are geolocated, their supporters united in support of a particular town or city and the point of difference between them and the opponent is based on that. But when it spills over, when difference becomes bullying on the basis of race, it crosses certain boundaries. It’s wrong.

Competition locates which differences we can compete on and which are unacceptable: as a society we are ok with saying you support one club or another, but not when that support becomes located around the racial makeup of a team. These are the conventions we base our societal values on.

Sub cultures, such as those of a particular business, club or society, do not exist in isolation: they are part of our overall national culture and, as such, share values within this. There are some things decided at societal level that must be mirrored by any sub culture within it. For example: equal pay for men and women. As a society, we have decided that when men and women do the same job, they should have equal pay. It would be unacceptable for any organisation to decide otherwise. These shared values may be codified in law, or may simply be part of an accepted principle or norm.

When cultures are fractured, they may permit cohesive sub cultures based around poor values: cliques that are united in their lack of integrity. This is clearly poor both for the organisation and within the wider context of a progressive society that values difference and inclusion. But it’s not just about doing what’s right from an ethical or moral viewpoint: there is a commercial advantage to being inclusive too.

Where there is no lack of shared values across the organisation and in line with wider society, there can be no common purpose. There may be the illusion of such, but if it excludes certain elements, it’s not truly common.

Fractured cultures are resistant to new ideas, because they don’t welcome difference. In the Social Age, when creativity and innovation are founded in an agile mindset, this is a challenge. These cultures provide low permission to experiment, and experimentation is how we trial new behaviours and skills, it’s how we develop.

An exclusive culture is also indicative of low social capital, which sits at the heart of social learning and leadership approaches. Without high social capital, it’s hard to leverage the power of the communities that surround and inform us, and if we are not in touch with these, how can we hope to prosper in an age where brand value and consumer judgement is decided by these communities.

My frustration was particularly strong as my friend serves in the police: an entity supposedly the guardian of society, a society that it is supposed to reflect and protect. And the grounds of the bullying are her gender and sexual preference.

In 2014, we still battle toxic cultures, in financial services, healthcare, the army, the police. But it’s unacceptable for people to be excluded on the grounds of their gender or sexual preference, just as it would be unacceptable for someone to be paid less because they think differently. Or because they’re deaf.

Why write about it?

Because if we’re not fighting for change, we’re supporting lethargy. If the police don’t reflect the makeup and values of the society that they serve, how can they hope to have our trust? We can’t hide these issues away: we have to fight for what’s right to drive wider cultural reform.

About julianstodd

Author, Artist, Researcher, and Founder of Sea Salt Learning. My work explores the context of the Social Age and the intersection of formal and social systems.
This entry was posted in Agile, Equality and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Fractured Culture: Exclusion

  1. Excellent points made. Good read for any person who is experiencing problems, and for those who could tune up their street senses to possible future challenges in the workplace.

  2. Pingback: Fractured Culture: Exclusion @julianstodd | E-L...

  3. Pingback: Fractured Culture: Exclusion @julianstodd | Lea...

  4. Pingback: Fractured Culture: Exclusion | Cultural Trendz ...

  5. devary says:

    This harkens back to the issue everywhere, in every nation or group: what do you do with the bully who is willing to escalate aggression to the place you are not willing to go?

    When I worked with children who had emotional disorders, many were violent. Their behavior was not acceptable or safe and it was necessary to separate them from the other students and contain their bodies in locations where their violence could not endanger anyone, themselves included. On rare occasions this included biomedical interventions. But over time, in a controlled environment, behavioral modification, communication therapy, medication for some, and highly attuned, consistent responses from us around them, crafted specifically, and fine tuned, for that child, became recovery and in many cases re-integration into the general education community.

    But work is not a controlled environment and the majority of people are not specially trained to respond against instinct to bullying, aggression, threat, intimidation, or the other tactics that bullies use to promote their preferred culture, and their dominant position in it. Your friend’s impulse to run away is not wrong. The notion that someone in that position should tough it out has its adherents, but I’m not one of them. I believe that we should not intervene with natural consequences. People who are not bullies should not have to tolerate bullying for any length of time. If they can’t fight openly, leaving is the right choice.

    The natural consequences, in the new world of economics and business, is that cultures predicated on male competitive dominance hierarchies will not survive long. They will end much sooner if good, intelligent, empathetic people are taught to leave immediately and never provide their talents or energies to such enterprises. No one intelligent, capable, innovative or creative does well in such environments. Why should we promote the idea that if they put up with it long enough, they’ll be able to change something? That’s incredibly rare. That’s why we laud people who manage it. And they are invariably warriors of incredible bravery. Most of us aren’t, and trying to fight that kind of culture just depletes us and destroys us, hurts our families and undercuts the contributions we might make in a good place.

    Instead we should enable and support the leaving behind of such people and their broken cultures. Shine a bright light on what they do. Tell the world and then let them fail, their businesses die. In schools, drop the classes of bullying teachers, avoid and isolate bullies in the schoolyard. Make sure everyone knows who they are and what they do. They have nothing to offer the trajectory of greater society. Recreate whatever they claim to provide in a healthier model, away from them. Let’s stop trying to teach pigs to sing and go on to more satisfying lives in healthy places.

  6. Pingback: Dr Beeching’s Axe | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  7. Pingback: Healthcare Radicals: Change in the NHS | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  8. Pingback: Building a culture of sharing | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  9. Pingback: Reflection: why fairness? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  10. Pingback: Fragments of Fairness: why every conversation counts | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  11. Pingback: A Global Social Age | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  12. Pingback: Induction: the mechanisms of joining up. A #WorkingOutLoud post | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  13. Pingback: A Sense of Culture | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  14. Pingback: A Great Shared Venture: Why We Need To Rewire HR | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  15. Pingback: A Great Surprise: Thank You | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  16. Pingback: An Imperfect Humanity: Pity and Grace | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  17. Pingback: Organisational Pollution and Ethical Choice | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  18. Pingback: A Civil Society? | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  19. Pingback: Perpetually Opposed | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  20. Pingback: The Social Consequence of Exclusion #2 | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

  21. Pingback: #WorkingOutLoud on the ‘Modern Learning Capabilitites’ Programme | Julian Stodd's Learning Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.