The shape of community. How bonds of time, family and place form.

St Ives is a small fishing port at the very south west tip of England. It’s typical of many very popular and expensive tourist destinations down here in that the winding streets and sheltered harbour were built in poverty and isolation and now attract wealth and visitors. The twisting, narrow, cobbled streets are too small for cars, but perfect for trendy clothes shops, jewellers, galleries and cream teas.

The harbour itself is enclosed by the usual walls, heavy, sullen, solid, to keep out the battering of the open sea. And, as is usual, there is a lifeboat station here, huddled by the water’s edge, housing a large boat in the familiar blue and orange of the RNLI.

On the wall of lifeboat station is a plaque, a tragically familiar plaque, detailing the men who lost their lives early last century on one final desperate trip to save lives. It’s not unusual to see these. Fishing communities always live close to disaster, and sometimes the odds play against you. These people, the names now carved in stone, were brothers, husbands and sons within the community.

Community is more than cobbles and slate roofed houses. It’s more than a fishing harbour and a pub. It’s more than sisters, mothers and wives waiting for news on stormy winter’s day. Community is about common purpose, about shared values and identity, about togetherness.

Driving or walking through this area, we move between different communities, each one sharing some similar traits of architecture, geology and accent, but each slightly different in character and style and, as we move further east, each changes until, eventually, you find yourself in totally different types of community, sharing a common language, but little else.

We talk about ‘community’ a lot in terms of learning, in terms of virtual environments, in the online space, but don’t often stop to think what community actually is. It’s certainly not something premeditated, something inevitable. Communities can form quickly but can have the permanence of stone: networks that are not necessarily bound to location or time, but rather which can fly free from the bounds of place to exist over distances and in different spaces.

The newer types of community that we talk about a lot at the moment may be lighter, less permanent, may be more engineered and built for convenience, but they share some common roots with all communities.

So, whilst ‘community’ is a term that we throw around lightly online, it’s founded at the very heart of how we build our society, in the bounds of family, friends and strangers in a stormy harbour. Community means a lot to us, wherever it sits.

About julianstodd

Author, Artist, Researcher, and Founder of Sea Salt Learning. My work explores the context of the Social Age and the intersection of formal and social systems.
This entry was posted in Community, Engagement, Environment and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The shape of community. How bonds of time, family and place form.

  1. Fascinating topic, Julian, to which you apply your usual thoughtfulness. I’ve written about notions of “home,” “community,” “sanctuary,” and “identify” in my blog: http://www.newlycanadian.wordpress.com. We moved from Bloomington, Indiana, to a small fishing and boatbuilding village on the South Shore of Nova Scotia in 2010. Lunenburg is a UNESCO World Heritage Site with approximately 2300 hardy souls, many of whom can trace their family lineage back to 1752, when the town was founded. For more on “home” and contemporary notions of what it means to be “rooted,” you might want to take a look at “New Keywords: A Revised Vocabulary of Culture and Society” (Blackwell, 2005), edited by Tony Bennett, Lawrence Grossberg, and Meaghan Morris. (Grossberg was one of my professors at the University of Illinois when I was in graduate school there studying English literature in the 1980s.) See in particular Bennet’s entry on “home.” What I find intriguing is new understandings of “home” not as a fixed point in space but understood as “a mobile, symbolic habitat, a performative way of life and of doing things in which one makes one’s home while in movement.” Bennett comments that this way of understanding home “encompasses a broader and more fluid set of relationships between traveling and dwelling.” He draws on the work of D. Morley: “Home Territories: Media, Mobility, and Identity” (Routledge, 2000). I intend to investigate Morley’s work soon.

    • julianstodd says:

      Thanks for sharing these great links and resources – lots to delve into there. It’s fascinating to explore how communities form in any space, be that physical or virtual. J

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.